• werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m now pretty sure we got our last Nintendo switch game. I’m not going to buy out kids anything Nintendo anymore. They are the most recent RIAA.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      You were buying Switch games but because of something unrelated to your gaming and purchasing habits, you’re going to stop your unrelated behavior?

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        that is typically how boycotts work yes.

        Nestle isn’t poisoning their bottled water but some people still refuse to buy it.

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t even have a single Nintendo or game of any sort. My kids got dupped by YouTube and so now it’s either cry or pay for that shit…a few years ago… Today though, they are old enough to get pissed at things. I shall explain what Nintendo is doing so that they make better choices in the future.

        • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          What doesn’t make sense though is why now all of a sudden? They were content to buy Nintendo games up until yesterday, but the Ryujinx takedown, which was amicably agreed upon between Nintendo and the devs, that was the final straw? This just screams disingenuous en vogue Nintendo bashing to me.

          People refuse to buy Nestle products because Nestle is a wildly unethical company and its behavior directly affects which products are available to purchase. Nintendo protecting their IP, while sucking for pirates, doesn’t violate any known ethical principle. Apples and oranges.

            • WldFyre@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              That was their point lol

              This is arguably the tamest thing Nintendo has done recently, so it’s a weird final straw

              • refalo@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I should have articulated my point better. I meant that this has been the “final straw” for some people for most of those steps along the way in the picture. If you look at the comments from then it’s often the same kind of thing you’re seeing right now. That’s why I mentioned selection bias, because there are actually lots of final straws happening over time, people just aren’t seeing those or weren’t around then.

          • nef@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Are you suggesting that no one is allowed to see Nintendo do a new bad thing and say “I’m no longer willing to give them my money”?

            Not to mention there’s nothing ‘amicable’ about a massive corporation, infamous for their lawsuits, approaching a single programmer with a deal that is obviously the only way to avoid being sued, despite the fact that emulators are legal.

            If someone purchases a Switch game they have every right to back it up and use an emulator to play it. Instead of strongarming these projects into submission, the ethical thing would be working with them to sell legal access to ROMs.