Wild take on the ACAB-thematic, but this way, it makes sense. But I wouldn agree. Im more like the “Most people have a good heart, so lets make the world a better place together”-guy. :)

No further questions :)

Ist this a yes?

• The police isnt a coheaive group too.

• the decision what the police has to do and not is a decision by our democratic system - not by the police, or more exactly, the police hast just a really small part in this decisions

So probably you are just against our democratic system?

Its a complex thematic, but thats not right.

To tell that the police has a problem with fascist, racist and sexist tendecies is right. But its a problem every larger group has, even the green party, the left party or the Anti-Fa.

Especially in some federal states like Schleswig-Holstein, Niedersachsen and Baden-Würtemberg the police did a lot to prevent anti-democratic and fascist tendecies. And were in some part really sucessfull.

Furthermore the biggest Police-Union (GDP) placed statements against the AfD and PolizeiGrün (a green-party near, left-alternative Police-organisation) is doing a lot of political influence-work.

So imho for Germany and other parts of Europe: If you are a true anarchist, “ACAB” is just consequent. For all other political views its at least naive.

Yeah :. A real tragedy

Night in the Woods felt very comforting to me. Its not really the "cozy game. For me it felt more like the movie Juno. Cool and funny characters getting along with some everyday and some harsh toppics. Combined with a cool artstyle and soundtrack.

First of all, lets make one thing clear. Im very fond for the idea of cutting the wealth of the rich for the community. I just dont like the wording in this campaign. Imho it would be much more to convincing to be honest and transparent. Or by speaking less concrete like “tax the rich”

And furthermore: This kinda explainations is not that easy, especially in a foreign language.

Ok, lets try to think this through.

Billionaires usually dont have most of theire money as private wealth. As far as im rember, most of the German Billionaires are “Mittelständler”, part of old bussiness-Families or are shareholder as part of their bussines. Sure, they have often have a similar power over their wealth as private owner, but its not the same. And furthermore if they have a lot of “private wealth”, they hide it somewhere like, foundations(?, Stiftungen), SubCompanies or oversea.

So we have to cut non-private-Wealth.

Art. 14 wont help much there, because you have compensate to them and imho its hard to proof the weight of the greater needs in the “Güterabwägung” (balancing of the interests?). To see how complicated this kinda stuff is, take a look at the “Deutsche Wohnen enteignen”-campaign and the outcome by now.

So the more suitable way to achieve this goal would be taxes and removing tax-holes. But how do you want to tax only billionairs? Especially when they are “companies”, “foundations” etc? Especially without collateral-Damages? Or breaking fundamental rules like the equal treatment principle(?) Besides: even if you finde a possible way, you would be facing a lot of political power in an unfair fight against the billionairs. And because of all the lawsuits it will be taking a long time to get through. And if you would have achieved you goal in the long run, the money will long be gone. Somewhere “far” away.

Its just a short take on this problem, but as a young father, my freetime is limited :>

No I say a law thats works as promised would be (imho) against the constitution

Especially because its quite complicated or impossible (imho) to a enact a law that does exactly what they promise by not breaking the constitution: Its just populism and a lie

Yeah, but it not unlikely that “Die Linke” wont get into Parliament because of the “5% Barrier”(A Mechanism that prevents parties from entering the German Parliament, if they are below 5% total votes. There are some complicated exceptions, but basicly this is it). Furthermore many Parties dont want to form a coalation with them and this could be against german constitution … So this is very unlikely to happen.