Cosmic Cleric

I’m capable of doing so, if I want to. But again, its not my job to enforce it, I’m just availing myself to the laws protection, like all other citizens, corporation, or individual.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

maybe if everyone is telling you the same thing, it’s not us that’s wrong? food for thought.

One, not everybody is telling me the same thing. I learned to do this from someone else here on Lemmy, and I’ve had others tell me that they like that I’m doing what I’m doing, and that its ok to do.

Two, never heard anybody give a valid reason why I’m wrong, just that I’m wasting my time, or that they don’t like me doing it because it bothers them to see it, as if they want the Internet to format what they see to their personal tastes/likes.

Three, its a single line of text that appears in a smaller font at the bottom/footer of a comment. If people are really getting bent out of shape over it, then maybe they need to do some self-interspection on their end.

Four, if its not a smaller font line of text, and they seeing regular sized formatting text, then they need to talk to the developers of the client they are using, and ask them to support sub/superscript fonts. The web site client shows it just fine.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

all due respect, but you are not a news entity and you will never know whether your license was honored, so i really don’t see the point. but like i said, you do you

The point is to have protection for my content. I have the same rights under the law as ANYBODY ELSE. All are capable of licensing their content on social sites that protects themselves with Safe Harbor laws.

As far as enforcement goes, that is not my job. If a law is not enforced doesn’t mean I don’t try to avail myself of the protections under the law. I don’t constantly audit my local police force to be sure that they are enforcing laws.

I want my content to be available and used by open-source organizations, and I signal that via my license. Otherwise the default licensing (show nothing) does not allow them to do so.

Finally, is it really worth your time (and all other citizens) to nag/harrass someone away from using the same laws that Corporations use to their benefit? I mean I point to an “Ask Lemmy” post often (here, let me do it again) where this has been hashed out already. You’re not saying anything new. But it seems like every individual still wants to recreate the conversation again, and again, and again, for SOME strange reason.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

not sure if it is effective

Well, if its good enough for ProPublica, and others, its good enough for me. 👍

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Here you go: https://lemmy.world/comment/9805932

and: https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

And economists have estimated that the trade policy will cost the typical US household more than $1,200 a year

Remember this, when you hear about tax cuts for the wealthy.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

From the article…

According to KPBS, US Customs and Border Protection accused Brösche of planning to violate the terms of the visa waiver program by intending to work as a tattoo artist during her time in Los Angeles.

… and …

Lofving said she asked Ice agents if Brösche could be sent back to Mexico, but they responded that her lack of legal residency would mean she would be deported back to Germany. Lofving also said she tried to get help from the German consulate in Los Angeles.