The way they talk and run the government is like kids playing with this:

Except the kids have horrific parents and think screaming and throwing pans is how adulting works.

Virus spreads.

I think I’m missing something because you don’t usually donate sperm and then act like it’s your children afterwards. It sounds like a creepy move to insert himself in the lives of a bunch of families.

I’m not sure what to make of this guy. In this case I guess his animosity towards Russia is conflicting with his “sophisticated nationalism?” He is wanted by Russia because it’s illegal in Russia to remove Soviet monuments in Poland. (lmao) But I guess if it doesn’t help him build a turbo-Christian Poland then he doesn’t want it… he’s sorta stuck in the middle.

When you phrase losses of aircraft in percentages of your fleet, you’re talking about a disaster.

I think the only bad thing about the Holocaust was that Germany did it. Germany threatened established colonial powers. They threatened international order. Therefore the Holocaust is a terrible thing and Germany had to be stopped.

When the good guys do a Holocaust it’s not bad anymore.

Edit: I mean as far as most people use it.

I wish soldiers fighting for our freedoms would take on a different connotation. I wish it meant something.

175 billion dollars to build a thing in just a few years that’s meant to protect America from attacks…

What attacks? Terrorists hijacking planes? Russians capturing the presidency? Right wing extremism? School shootings?

There’s nothing immediate. And some trumpy dome doesn’t sound like we’re future proofing anything but Lockheed Martin’s bank accounts.

Worse, it’s an image of Britain.

Israel has the means to discover and expose evidence. Israel has the need for positive PR. But Israel consistently does not provide satisfactory evidence for their actions. Best case, they only have “reasonable” suspicion from a military standpoint. At best they think they should be blowing up hospitals for reasons, but know people won’t accept the collection of evidence they have, and so this is what happens.

To rephrase for lemmings: Israel bad. Israel want evidence. Israel can get evidence. But Israel no provide evidence. Probably because there’s no evidence.

When I read through the American report, it detailed genocide by Israel. It painted a horrific picture with Israel holding up or “losing” food and medicine in order to starve civilians.

The report concluded with “There is no genocide.”

It’s what happens when there’s a genocide but you decide there isn’t one, but you still need to describe the genocide.

Maybe it’s really because chess is one of the traditional ways to escape oppression. There’s more than a few top players that have done so, and speak out about it.

If coalition governments are more democratic it’s crazy how France, Austria, Germany, and Czech Republic (and probably more) all support genocide, prevent protests against it, accuse citizens of being antisemites, and veto attempts by international courts to do something about genocide. But then again, other coalitions like in Belgium can go against the trend.

At least Canada’s two party system turned away from Trump. Canadians did better with two parties than other countries can do with 20.

What are the chances that the Cardinals protest vote two elections in a row and they accidentally elect a decent man again? Can you imagine back to back decent Popes? Not sure if it’s happened in my lifetime.

Lol what happened to people championing reading things carefully before commenting? At worst my wording was vague. Could’ve searched what I was talking about and easily realized was I thought. I assume people can search my comments and see I’m not defending Israel.

The missing context is in the article. If people read it and remembered current events they too would find it utter bullshit that their excuse was “Enemy soldiers use ambulances.” And then my comment would naturally follow.

Reading comprehension.

Reading fucking comprehension.

I bring up the time IDF used an ambulance during a raid, that time they killed a grandma, in response to the IDF saying they shot these people because terrorists use ambulances… and people think I’m defending Israel.

Reading comprehension. Come on guys, say it with me. Reading comprehension!

Are you fucking stupid? I’m saying Israel kills people for using ambulances, and then bringing up the time Israel used an ambulance and killed a grandma.

The reason they give for shooting ambulances is that Hamas has used ambulances to move soldiers.

“On December 19, 2024, soldiers from the ‘Duvdevan’ unit (Israeli military) took part in an operational mission to detain terrorists in Nablus. During the operation, an ambulance-like vehicle was used for operational purposes, without authorisation and without the relevant commanders’ approval.”

And we’ll create this value by entering into a “who can slash more rights” contest with the USA and China! After giving them a several year head start!!