The secretive Russian satellite in space that U.S. officials believe is connected to a nuclear anti-satellite weapon program has appeared to be spinning uncontrollably, suggesting it may no longer be functioning in what could be a setback for Moscow’s space weapon efforts, according to U.S. analysts.

Believed to be a radar satellite for Russian intelligence as well as a radiation testing platform, the satellite last year became the center of U.S. allegations that Russia for years has been developing a nuclear weapon capable of destroying entire satellite networks, such as SpaceX’s vast Starlink internet system that Ukrainian troops have been using.

https://archive.ph/n8SO8

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Is there a source that isn’t “US analysts”?
    That’s about as reliable as “Russian analysts” or “Chinese analysts” right now.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not sure how much of a setback this is.

    If it failed and it’s out of control, I assume that it’s an issue with normal “satellite” things — the computer or the thrusters or whatever, stuff that’s involved in maneuvering the satellite. A failure in systems that Russia can and has done before. Not with the radar systems onboard.

    And I’d guess that the costs are mostly in R&D rather than the manufacturing of the satellite, costs that wouldn’t need to be repeated for Russia to build such a satellite over again.

    I assume that if Russia wants to do so, they can launch a replacement satellite.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      How much do you think it costs to build and launch a new satellite? Do you have enough faith in Russian manufactthat this won’t happen again, in a slightly different way? Will all the replacement money end up where it should?

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        OP has a solid point about costs sunk into R&D. A second unit is an order of magnitude cheaper to launch. OTOH, Russia broke as fuck.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Oh, I certainly agree that r&d is probably higher than manufacture, but they are ninijisibg the cost to replace. There is also runk cost fallacy to consider.

          Russia doesn’t have the spare cash lying in the couch as you say and the cost to manufacturer is higher when under sanctions. The ability to manufacturer is also hamstring.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Especially since they’ve currently got a big, expensive war on their hands, that they’re all-hands-on-deck for.