Right, but that’s exactly my point, it likely wouldn’t just be one flat color. If you scale it by population density you get a map displaying the average distance between kids and parents compared to the average distance between any two people which I would expect to be 1. non-uniform…
My point was that I expect exactly the opposite: that the average distance between kids and parents is pretty much exactly proportional to the average distance between any two people.
That said, if you wanted another acceptable alternative, you can also remove all outliers and likely return the curve back to normal.
I’m not sure I would call that “acceptable.” I would be more likely to call it “destroying the interesting features of the data.”
See also: https://xkcd.com/1138/
Look, if they’re gonna use a device running Linux* instead of Windows to represent “PC,” I sure as Hell ain’t gonna complain about it even if it is a handheld!
(* legitimate Linux, as opposed to some bastardized and Tivoized thing like Android or what they put on TVs)
In the Internet age, I believe Mercator remains standard because it’s easy, since image buffers and UI viewports are implemented as rectangular arrays. For example, when you click on the map the pixel coordinates can be converted to (lat, long) just by scaling, without having to do complicated coordinate transformations.
Apply for a refund (regardless of how many hours played you have).
That’s exactly why consoles are exploitative anti-consumer trash that ought to be cracked down on by the FTC, though.
LOL, glad you had a good time.
Anyway, let me put it this way: I would very much rather live in Atlanta (eastern time) than just over the border in Alabama (central time).
Makes me appreciate being in Atlanta, which is in eastern time but (as shown on this map) “ought” to be in central time. I get a daylight-savings-time-like experience year-round and then get actual daylight savings time stacked on top of it.
Typical Europeans: colonizing this post about Africa to make it about themselves instead. \s
Wait, what was that quiet bit in the middle? /s
A recall that ran entirely locally—which is absolutely a necessary precondition for it to count as “secure”—would necessarily contain only information stored on disk because where else would it put the data it’s collecting/analyzing?
In other words, if it screenshots you accessing your back via website, that screenshot would be stored locally and would be just as protected by full disk encryption as the rest of your files.
But if an attacker has decrypted access to a user’s home directory, aren’t they screwed anyway?
I’m not sure encryption is the issue here. Why do you think this data needs to be more encrypted than the rest of the user’s home directory, which should hopefully already be protected by full-disk encryption if the user cares about that sort of thing?
TIL Vandenberg Air Force Base got renamed.
Also, I’m pretty sure that one in Georgia doesn’t actually exist.